Case study
Refrigeration condenser fouling detection
Cooling towersEnergy & electricityFood & Beverage ProcessingControlled Environment Agriculture (Greenhouses)
Head pressure rose while load remained constant, revealing condenser fouling and quantifying its energy cost.
A refrigeration condenser’s head pressure rose while the cooling load stayed steady. We compare pressure with load to show the increasing energy penalty and help the team decide when cleaning is needed.
What the data showed
Hover or arrow-key across the trace to read any interval. The flagged point is the one that started the conversation.
| Interval | Rack 1 (kPa/kW) |
|---|---|
| D1 | 13 |
| D2 | 12 |
| D3 | 12 |
| D4 | 12 |
| D5 | 13 |
| D6 | 13 |
| D7 | 12 |
| D8 | 13 |
| D9 | 13 |
| D10 | 13 |
| D11 | 13 |
| D12 | 13 |
| D13 | 13 |
| D14 | 13 |
| D15 | 13 |
| D16 | 13 |
| D17 | 13 |
| D18 | 13 |
| D19 | 13 |
| D20 | 13 |
| D21 | 13 |
| D22 | 13 |
| D23 | 13 |
| D24 | 13 |
| D25 | 13 |
| D26 | 13 |
| D27 | 13 |
| D28 | 13 |
| D29 | 13 |
| D30 | 13 |
| D31 | 13 |
| D32 | 13 |
| D33 | 13 |
| D34 | 14 |
| D35 | 13 |
| D36 | 13 |
| D37 | 13 |
| D38 | 14 |
| D39 | 14 |
| D40 | 14 |
| D41 | 14 |
| D42 | 14 |
| D43 | 14 |
| D44 | 14 |
| D45 | 14 |
| D46 | 14 |
| D47 | 14 |
| D48 | 14 |
| D49 | 14 |
| D50 | 14 |
| D51 | 14 |
| D52 | 14 |
| D53 | 14 |
| D54 | 14 |
| D55 | 14 |
| D56 | 14 |
| D57 | 14 |
| D58 | 14 |
| D59 | 14 |
| D60 | 14 |
| D61 | 14 |
| D62 | 14 |
| D63 | 14 |
| D64 | 14 |
| D65 | 14 |
| D66 | 15 |
| D67 | 14 |
| D68 | 14 |
| D69 | 14 |
| D70 | 15 |
| D71 | 15 |
| D72 | 15 |
| D73 | 15 |
| D74 | 15 |
| D75 | 15 |
| D76 | 15 |
| D77 | 15 |
| D78 | 15 |
| D79 | 15 |
| D80 | 15 |
| D81 | 15 |
| D82 | 15 |
| D83 | 15 |
| D84 | 15 |
| D85 | 15 |
| D86 | 15 |
| D87 | 15 |
| D88 | 15 |
| D89 | 15 |
| D90 | 15 |
| Before | A cleaning schedule based on the calendar |
|---|---|
| After | A cleaning schedule based on the measured penalty |
Background
A food storage and processing facility depends on refrigeration to maintain its operating conditions. As the condenser fouls, the compressor has to work harder to provide the same cooling. Our review follows that relationship over time, using the refrigeration load as the context for the pressure reading.
The problem
The system can continue operating while its electricity demand rises. A cleaning schedule based only on the calendar gives the team little connection between the planned work and the condenser’s current condition. The increasing effort can therefore remain part of everyday operation until someone looks at pressure alongside the load.
How we found it
We use a head pressure transducer on the refrigeration circuit and monitor compressor current. The dashboard follows the ratio of head pressure to load, with a threshold for cleaning. A rising ratio while load remains constant makes the developing fouling visible and connects the maintenance question to the measured operating penalty.
What changed
The cleaning decision follows the measured penalty rather than the calendar alone. The team can review the pressure and load trend to see why the condenser needs attention. That gives maintenance a specific condition to act on and an operating record to use when discussing the timing of the work.
The lesson
We keep the load beside the pressure reading so a change has context. For this system, the useful signal is increasing pressure for the same cooling duty. Continuing to follow the ratio after cleaning gives the team a way to review the effect of maintenance and watch for renewed drift, with the next cleaning decision tied to the equipment’s measured condition.
What changed
Before
A cleaning schedule based on the calendar
After
A cleaning schedule based on the measured penalty
Head pressurevs. load
The ratio drifts long before the system trips on high pressure.
Where to go next
The sector, the sibling studies, and the calculator that runs this same arithmetic on your own numbers.
Cooling towersWaterManufacturing: Automotive, Plastics & RubberBuilding Materials, Concrete & Aggregates
Cooling tower blowdown optimization
A plastics manufacturing factory
Blowdown was controlled by a timer rather than conductivity, causing usable water to be discharged unnecessarily.
1 setpointchanged
Energy & electricityBulk Handling & Rail Logistics
Night setback that never happened
A distribution warehouse
The overnight setback had silently stopped working, and it was worth about a third of the load.
~35%of overnight electrical load
Energy & electricityManufacturing: Automotive, Plastics & Rubber
Three factories, one unit of production, one outlier
A manufacturer with three factories
Same product, same equipment, and one factory used about 40% more energy per unit.
~40%more energy per unit
Find out what’s hiding in your factory.
Every study on this site started with somebody walking a floor and asking what the numbers actually were. Our team will do the same on yours and tell you honestly what we find.
Book a site visitAll case studies
or call 1-833-QUANTFY (1-833-782-6839)
