Case study
Conveyor-drive bearing degradation detected six weeks before failure
Predictive maintenanceBulk Handling & Rail LogisticsManufacturing: automotive, plastics & rubber
The bearing’s vibration signature began changing approximately six weeks before the projected failure point.
A conveyor-drive bearing’s vibration signature began changing ahead of its projected failure point. We track the bearing against its own baseline so the team can plan the replacement around the line’s schedule.
What the data showed
Explore the chart to inspect the readings.
| Interval | Drive end (mm/s) | Non-drive end (mm/s) |
|---|---|---|
| D1 | 1.86 | 1.79 |
| D2 | 1.88 | 1.88 |
| D3 | 1.98 | 1.81 |
| D4 | 1.87 | 1.87 |
| D5 | 1.93 | 1.72 |
| D6 | 1.83 | 1.84 |
| D7 | 1.94 | 1.73 |
| D8 | 1.90 | 1.73 |
| D9 | 1.84 | 1.79 |
| D10 | 1.94 | 1.81 |
| D11 | 1.93 | 1.77 |
| D12 | 1.99 | 1.73 |
| D13 | 1.94 | 1.84 |
| D14 | 1.93 | 1.77 |
| D15 | 1.84 | 1.80 |
| D16 | 1.96 | 1.73 |
| D17 | 1.89 | 1.86 |
| D18 | 1.95 | 1.86 |
| D19 | 1.91 | 1.80 |
| D20 | 1.85 | 1.71 |
| D21 | 1.89 | 1.82 |
| D22 | 1.97 | 1.85 |
| D23 | 1.86 | 1.80 |
| D24 | 1.86 | 1.87 |
| D25 | 1.82 | 1.76 |
| D26 | 1.91 | 1.89 |
| D27 | 1.88 | 1.89 |
| D28 | 1.82 | 1.76 |
| D29 | 1.94 | 1.85 |
| D30 | 1.90 | 1.86 |
| D31 | 1.94 | 1.80 |
| D32 | 1.92 | 1.78 |
| D33 | 1.96 | 1.71 |
| D34 | 1.88 | 1.76 |
| D35 | 1.95 | 1.86 |
| D36 | 1.82 | 1.80 |
| D37 | 1.97 | 1.81 |
| D38 | 1.88 | 1.88 |
| D39 | 1.92 | 1.75 |
| D40 | 1.97 | 1.86 |
| D41 | 1.90 | 1.79 |
| D42 | 1.83 | 1.73 |
| D43 | 1.89 | 1.85 |
| D44 | 1.97 | 1.79 |
| D45 | 1.97 | 1.73 |
| D46 | 1.89 | 1.81 |
| D47 | 1.87 | 1.86 |
| D48 | 1.98 | 1.73 |
| D49 | 1.87 | 1.85 |
| D50 | 1.89 | 1.83 |
| D51 | 1.81 | 1.80 |
| D52 | 1.84 | 1.80 |
| D53 | 1.89 | 1.87 |
| D54 | 1.86 | 1.76 |
| D55 | 1.86 | 1.81 |
| D56 | 1.95 | 1.75 |
| D57 | 2.01 | 1.82 |
| D58 | 2.22 | 1.78 |
| D59 | 2.32 | 1.72 |
| D60 | 2.27 | 1.88 |
| D61 | 2.36 | 1.76 |
| D62 | 2.46 | 1.73 |
| D63 | 2.60 | 1.79 |
| D64 | 2.63 | 1.75 |
| D65 | 2.83 | 1.80 |
| D66 | 2.84 | 1.71 |
| D67 | 3.00 | 1.86 |
| D68 | 3.09 | 1.79 |
| D69 | 3.24 | 1.76 |
| D70 | 3.25 | 1.82 |
| D71 | 3.41 | 1.79 |
| D72 | 3.39 | 1.87 |
| D73 | 3.52 | 1.78 |
| D74 | 3.57 | 1.82 |
| D75 | 3.78 | 1.74 |
| D76 | 3.71 | 1.81 |
| D77 | 3.84 | 1.87 |
| D78 | 4.01 | 1.73 |
| D79 | 4.03 | 1.87 |
| D80 | 4.10 | 1.83 |
| D81 | 4.28 | 1.81 |
| D82 | 4.40 | 1.83 |
| D83 | 4.42 | 1.77 |
| D84 | 4.55 | 1.85 |
| D85 | 4.55 | 1.85 |
| D86 | 4.75 | 1.85 |
| D87 | 4.82 | 1.87 |
| D88 | 4.85 | 1.77 |
| D89 | 4.92 | 1.75 |
| D90 | 5.09 | 1.86 |
| Before | A line stoppage waiting to happen |
|---|---|
| After | A planned Saturday bearing change |
Background
At a bulk handling facility, a main conveyor depends on its drive bearing to keep the line moving. A failure at that bearing can stop the whole line. The maintenance question is how to recognize deterioration early enough to choose when the replacement happens, while the conveyor is still operating.
The problem
The bearing gives little audible warning. Waiting for a noticeable sound leaves maintenance with less opportunity to arrange the work. The useful signal is a change from the bearing’s established behaviour, seen over time while the asset continues to run, rather than a fault first discovered after the conveyor stops.
How we found it
We use vibration and temperature monitoring on the drive bearing, with motor current supplying runtime hours. The trend is compared with the asset’s own baseline. Alerts call attention to a changing signature so maintenance can review the direction of the readings and the operating history behind them.
What changed
The changing vibration signature gives the team advance warning ahead of the projected seizure point. The bearing change is planned for a Saturday. Maintenance can schedule the repair around the line instead of letting the failure determine the timing. Maintenance continues reviewing the trend as the planned replacement approaches.
The lesson
Compare vibration with the bearing’s history and runtime to guide inspection and plan maintenance. Continue monitoring after replacement to check its behaviour when the conveyor returns to service.
What changed
Before
A line stoppage waiting to happen
After
A planned Saturday bearing change
6 weeksof warning
Between the first signature change and projected seizure.
Where to go next
Predictive maintenanceMunicipal & Public Utilities
Pump cavitation caught three weeks early
A municipal water facility
The vibration signature changed about three weeks before anyone would have heard it.
3 weeksof warning
Predictive maintenanceWaterBreweries & Beverage
A failing diaphragm pump, caught before it failed
Carlsberg Canada
A transfer line's flow signature drifted, the alert fired, and the diaphragm was replaced on a schedule instead of during a shutdown.
Scheduledreplacement
See where monitoring could help your facility.
Our team will walk your facility with you and identify where monitoring could help.
Book a site visitAll case studies
or call 1-833-QUANTFY (1-833-782-6839)
